XENUM
Back
Technology5 min

Chemotherapy for Diesel

The advantages of diesel engines are as well known as their disadvantages. More economical thanks to higher efficiency, they are more complex and expensive because of the specifics of their design. Of course, paying less at the pumps is pleasant. However, this barrel of honey also has its spoonful of tar: the moment the diesel starts to misfire even a little, questions immediately arise – is it the injection pump or the injectors…?

Indeed, repairing a diesel is no gift. Parts are expensive, so when it comes to diesel maintenance one must be especially careful. However, in many cases the alarm raised by seemingly obvious signs of needing extensive repair can turn out to be completely unnecessary. After all, it can happen that a daunting and inevitable problem suddenly finds a simple and affordable solution.

For example, a typical case. The car's diesel engine suddenly loses responsiveness and sensitivity to the accelerator pedal, the RPMs wander, and when revving, thick black smoke pours from the exhaust pipe. “Injection pump or injectors,” the neighbors at the parking lot speculate. “Yes, unlucky, but what can you do – it’s a diesel.” Yet with such signs of an apparently inevitable, costly, and complex repair, there is no need to despair. In any case, until the true cause of the engine’s obvious ailment is accurately diagnosed and the repair methods are defined, there is no point in lamenting.

In many cases, the cause of diesel engine problems can be simply dirt. Dirt that has accumulated where it has no business to be – in the intake tract of the engine’s manifold. And if such an unpleasantness occurs, the diesel engine begins to behave as if it has suddenly and clearly worn out prematurely to the limit.

First of all, it is worth understanding the causes of intake tract contamination in diesels. There are many such causes, but it all starts, as is known, with fuel quality. If the cetane number of diesel fuel is reduced, below 50, which is by no means rare at our stations, such fuel has an increased tendency to form carbon deposits. This issue is amplified by the design features of modern diesel engines. In the intake manifold of most of them an EGR valve is obligatorily installed, an important component of the exhaust gas recirculation system.

The widespread adoption of this system is due to its ability to reduce the NOx percentage in diesel exhaust gases. During low‑load engine operation, this valve enables the air supplied to the engine cylinders to be diluted with exhaust gases – up to 15% of the total intake mass. Deprived of oxygen, this portion of exhaust gases acts in the cylinders similarly to an inert gas, slowing the reaction rate, lowering the fuel combustion temperature to a level where NOx does not form. At the same time, besides the direct impact on the engine’s environmental characteristics, the recirculation system solves another extremely important technical problem. Adding an inert component to the air charge supplied to the cylinders eliminates the risk of knock in regimes where the engine runs on a lean mixture. Under high and continuous loads the diesel engine operates without supplying such a component, i.e., exhaust gases, to the cylinders. In these regimes the EGR valve is closed, and therefore there is nothing in the intake manifold that could promote soot formation on its walls. However, this mode of operation, when cruising on a highway, is far from the most common in the overall picture of city‑car usage. Thus, soot formation in the intake manifold is only a matter of time, sooner or later, and any city‑car engine will eventually develop this problem.

In addition to the characteristics of the exhaust gas recirculation system, the vacuum pump that vents excess crankcase gases into the intake manifold also contributes to dirt formation in the intake manifold. Obviously, the oily mist that enters the intake manifold from the engine crankcase creates all the conditions for increased contamination of all surfaces, including the EGR valve itself. In a contaminated state this valve can completely fail to perform its normal functions, resulting in exhaust gases constantly being present in the intake manifold.

But it is not only exhaust gases and oil mist that can cause intake‑manifold contamination in a diesel. Another contributing factor can be the operation of the engine with faulty glow plugs. Starting a cold engine under such conditions is difficult for obvious reasons, and fuel also enters the manifold, worsening the overall contamination picture. Over time, considering all these causes, it is no surprise that the intake manifold becomes thoroughly coated with a thick layer of fuel‑oil‑like grime, whose presence in this location gives rise to a whole range of diesel‑operation problems.

Among auto service specialists and simply advanced users there is the opinion that the primary cause of soot formation in the intake manifold is the EGR valve. It is often even heard that this component in the engine is clearly unnecessary and can be easily sacrificed, accepting a loss of the engine's environmental performance.

However, the suggestion to block this valve is hardly worth tempting. The reason is that such a modification will increase the risk of engine operation with knocking, and worse, with knocking at a level that can fully affect engine components catastrophically. Of course, modern engine management systems somewhat compensate for such modifications, adapting so that knocking does not appear. But it is unlikely that one can seriously rely on such compensation being effective in all possible diesel operating modes.

In addition, one should not forget that the increase of NOx in the exhaust has consequences not only for the human body near the vehicle. When entering the engine crankcase, exhaust gases with elevated NOx content also adversely affect the oil, raising its acid number and promoting accelerated loss of alkalinity. Accelerated and unpredictable oil wear also promises nothing good for the reliability and longevity of diesel operation.

Operating a diesel engine in our conditions is, for a number of reasons, also associated with problems such as accelerated wear of the high‑pressure fuel pump (HPFP) and periodic injector fouling. In the case of modern‑design diesels, these problems are compounded by contamination of the EGR valve together with the turbine wheel when the engine is equipped with a turbocharger. As for engines whose exhaust system includes a DPF filter, intake‑tract issues also contribute to the failure of this expensive component.

In the fight for diesel health, the market traditionally offers a whole range of products designed to prevent intake‑tract contamination. For this purpose, diesel vehicle owners are offered fuel additives:

  • – injector cleaning;
  • – fuel moisture neutralization;
  • – cetane number increase;
  • – reduction of wear and corrosion of fuel system components;
  • – combustion improvement to reduce exhaust smoke;
  • – anti‑depressant additives that lower fuel gelling temperature;
  • – universal fuel additives.

The choice is vast. Yet at the same time there is no way to select the optimal combination of all these products to achieve maximum effectiveness of their use on the market. Therefore, a situation where a vehicle owner, even taking into account the need for compensatory measures when operating a diesel in our conditions, may encounter the problems common to all is entirely possible. In view of this, the Belgian company Xenum has offered its solution to the current problem. Xenum offers a comprehensive engine cleaning system, implemented with the Xenum I‑Flux 200, 4 WAY FLUX, DPF FLUSH TOOL installations.

Xenum’s I‑Flux technology allows the necessary engine cleaning work to be carried out without disassembly. Removal of deposits in the intake manifold that have formed as a result of contamination from the recirculation system, and deposits and carbon from the intake valves, is achieved by supplying an optimized chemical composition into the intake manifold. For this purpose, the built‑in compressor of the Xenum I‑Flux 200 unit is connected to the engine’s intake system, the engine (more details in the installation manual) is started and runs for 2 hours.

Xenum recommends performing this treatment at least once every six months, which enables a diesel operated in urban conditions to maintain its parameters within normal limits even far from optimal operating conditions. Periodic equipment‑based engine treatment with the I‑Flux chemical solution protects the engine from intake‑manifold deposits, eliminates the need for mechanical cleaning, and most importantly reduces the risk of failure of the expensive systems of a modern diesel vehicle.

Xenum has once again demonstrated that its technologies and preventive work effectively solve problems that otherwise would have to be eliminated through costly repairs involving replacement of damaged components and mechanisms. Prevention and therapy are better than radical intervention.

Share:

Comments

There are no comments yet. Be the first!

Comments are disabled for this article.

Related Posts